La Raza Car Show
17 JanStand With Big Bird
5 Oct![]() |
||
Dear Ismael, Stand with Big Bird. Click here to get your FREE Defend Public Media sticker. This isn’t just about Big Bird. It’s about quality journalism, arts programming, educational shows — all that we’ve come to expect from PBS. And it isn’t about one party or the other. The majority of Americans, across the political spectrum, support federal funding for PBS. P.S. We’ve been inspired by the creative responses on Facebook, Twitter and elsewhere as people show their love for NPR and PBS. Have a favorite image that you’ve seen? Created a great infographic you want to share with the world? Email me at jstearns@freepress.net The Free Press Action Fund does not endorse or oppose any candidates for public office. |
||
| The Free Press Action Fund is a nonpartisan organization building a nationwide movement for media that serve the public interest. The Free Press Action Fund does not support or oppose any candidate for public office. Learn more at www.freepress.net.
Join us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
|
||
Gary Johnson files anti-trust lawsuit to appear in presidential debates
23 Sep
Gary Johnson files anti-trust lawsuit to appear in presidential debates (via Raw Story )
Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson filed an anti-trust lawsuit suit in federal court Friday alleging that the Democratic and Republican parties are conspiring to keep third-party candidates out of the presidential debates and, as a result, out of the White House. In the suit, Johnson’…
IBM’s Watson should co-host a presidential debate, and fact-check the shit out of it in real-time.
26 Aug
“The problem with debates isn’t that the human moderators need computers to help them fact-check, the problem is they’re banned from fact-checking period.
Presidential debates are organized and run by the CPD, which is a corporation 50% owned by the Republican party and 50% by the Democratic party. The rules are whatever is best for those parties.
Before 1988, debates were run by the League of Women Voters, which is non-partisan, and ran non-partisan debates. So, for the ’88 election Bush and MondaleDukakis formed the CPD to be a common bloc against the LWV, to stop them from adding third-party candidates or making the debates too challenging. Eventually the LWV quit, because…
It has become clear to us that the candidates’ organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and honest answers to tough questions. The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public.
So since 1988 debates have been campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and honest answers to tough questions. Unless Watson is going to help them avoid substance more efficiently, this isn’t going to happen.”
~reddit user, hurffurf
source: http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/yv4a1/ibms_watson_should_cohost_a_presidential_debate/


















